EasyBill- Digital POS

EasyBill - Digital POS

Project Done at AI Verticle of PagarBook

Project year

2026

Project Duration

3 Weeks

Category

B2B

Platform

Mobile

Status

Live

Project year

2026

Project Duration

3 Weeks

Category

B2B

Platform

Mobile

Status

Live

View Next Project

Flyr- AI Image Creator

Turning Every Bill Into a Ledger

Turning Every Bill Into a Ledger

mubalil apps
mubalil apps
icon

M1 Retention

66%

icon

M1 Retention

66%

icon

Bills per shop per day

44

icon

Bills per shop per day

44

icon

MRR

45L +

icon

MRR

45L +

MRR

3 Cr.+

Paying Users

16K

M3 Retention

58%

What is the Product

EasyBill turns a shopkeeper's phone into his billing counter. He photographs his shelves once to build a catalogue, then bills like he's ordering on Zepto tap rice, four kilos, add, done. The customer scans a QR and the bill lands on their WhatsApp. No printer, no paper, no POS machine.

From any random click to e- Commerce Ready Images

What a POS is actually for

A restaurant has a POS. It takes the order, prints a slip, and hands it over. The obvious product is to do that on a phone and save the shopkeeper the hardware.


But most of the shops we were looking at don't have a POS and never did. A kirana owner adds it up in his head, tells you the number, and writes it in a notebook if he writes it anywhere. The machine was never the thing he was missing.


What he's missing is everything the machine would have been quietly doing underneath: what sold, what's left, what he ordered last month, who bought it.

Choosing the buyer before we chose the problem

Casual consumer, tier 3–4

Has Need of AI Generated Images

Will not Pay for it

No revenue attached to the output, free alternatives everywhere, images are a novelty, not an quirk.

Shape Image
Card Image
Small business, 3–4 people

Has Need of AI Generated Images

Will Pay for it

Output feeds directly into sales, already spends on photography, has expendable income

Shape Image
Card Image

Key Questions that needed Answers

Q1: How does a shop without a POS actually bill someone today?

Q2: What does the owner know about his own stock, and how?

Q3: What happens at the counter when there's a queue?

Q4: Would anyone type in four hundred products?

All four needed the same thing: going and looking. So that's where I started — with the listings, and then with the people behind them.

The Research

32 shops across 5 categories — kirana, restaurant, workshop, electrical, others in Bangalore and Jamshedpur. observation based interview sat at the counter during trading hours to see the transaction happening live and interviewed after close.


The most useful hours were the busy ones. Nothing about how a shop bills is visible in a quiet interview it's visible when three people are waiting and the owner is doing four things at once.

  • bold blue text reading "OK!" on soft pink background
  • frosted aluminum can with condensation on light blue background
  • Portrait of a woman eating an icecream
  • Abstract poster of red pink circle
  • Makeup products on a white background
  • beauty portrait with glossy lips and voluminous curly hair on lavender background
  • Person surfing on the waves in the ocean
  • minimalist illustration of white lightbulb with orange base on golden yellow and teal geometric background

Platform Problem

Then I found the thing that didn't fit. The same sellers were moving the same products, at the same price, over WhatsApp and moving them well. Same photos. Same product. One channel worked; the other didn't. So the photos weren't the whole problem. Something else was carrying the sale on WhatsApp and going missing on the marketplace.

On WhatsApp, the seller is the salesperson.
On a marketplace, the photo has to be.

On WhatsApp, the seller is the salesperson.
On a marketplace, the photo has to be.

How Business was ran

Flyr's seller is two or three people, often one family, running a business out of a single room in a tier 2–4 city. They add four or five new SKUs a month not many, which means each one has to earn its place. And they list the same stock across Meesho, Amazon and Myntra.


Those three aren't interchangeable. They're a ladder, and photography is what gates it. Meesho will take almost any image. Amazon has standards. Myntra has real requirements name them: model shots, background specs and a seller who can't produce that imagery doesn't get listed there at all, however good the product is.


So the cost of bad photography isn't only lost sales on the listings they have. It's being locked out of the channel where their margin would be best.

Insights from the User Research

Photography isn't how they compete on a marketplace. It's how they qualify for one.

Output could never be "a product photo". It had to be whatever each rung of the ladder demands which is where the four formats came from, including the branded status creative that no advertising tool builds.

There is no second photo. What they have is all they will ever have.

One photo in, permanently. Every idea that quietly depended on "take a better one" — guided capture, retry prompts, quality gates — came off the table in the same week.

They don't sell the product. They sell the certainty around it.

The image had to carry context, not just quality. An occasion, a person wearing it, a sense of where it belongs. "Make the photo sharper" stopped being a plausible answer.

They know exactly what they want. They just can't say it first.

The direction of the whole interaction. Asking them to describe wants the one thing they can't give; showing them something to react to asks for the thing they're best at. Choose an outcome, don't configure an input — and every decision in Act 2 is an application of that.

What I was solving for wasn't better Images.

It was getting a seller who can't describe what good looks like to a publishable creative across platforms.

What design had to survive

constrains the users brought

Digital Literacy of users

Sellers skim. Many read English slowly, some barely at all.

Design Vocabulary

"Lifestyle", "editorial" mean nothing. They can describe the image.

Need of customization

Giving control of image feels like they control output.

Units of Products

Four or five new SKUs a month, worked on in bursts between orders.

constrains the System brought

Systematic Prompt Setup

Making the prompt lineup such that the customization fall in line rather than destroying that intent of product image of the users.

Wrong image costs more

A creative showing detail the product doesn't have gets ordered, returned, and the seller eats the shipping and the rating.

Generation isn't instant

A server round trip of 8 seconds, on a budget Android over patchy 4G. A dropped connection mid-generation is normal, not an edge case.

Problems to Solve

One photo in, One photo out

Three decisions, not Thirty

Nothing to read

No vocabulary to learn

Faithful, not flattering photos

Right the first time

Works between platforms

Introduce trust elements

Ideal Flow

1

Upload

2

Select Style

3

Customization

4

Generate

Compititor Analysis

What they share is an assumption about who's holding the phone. Background removal, AI shadow, recolour, product staging, brand kits, instant resize, batch export.


That's the correct product for a Shopify seller in Austin with some visual literacy and an afternoon. It is the wrong product for a two-person shop in Meerut adding four SKUs a month between orders not because the tools are weak, but because every one of them asks a question our seller can't answer.

The Observation

They hand you tools. We had to hand over taste.

PhotoRoom gives a seller background removal, AI shadows, recolour and product staging, then trusts them to compose something good. Our seller has no reference for what good looks like.

They put the product on a background. We put it on a person.

The editor tools stage a product in a scene. For apparel and jewellery in India the model is the sale a kurta on a hanger and the same kurta worn are not the same listing, and Myntra won't take the first one at all.

They format for storefronts. We format for status.

Instant Resize covers Instagram, Amazon and Shopify. It doesn't cover the channel these sellers actually own WhatsApp status, posted several times a day to people who've already bought once which is why Flyr sets the shop's branding into the image itself.

Decision 1 - What a Shoot Actually Produces

What they're selling — categories

We opened with two categories — clothing and jewellery because those were where the research said the gap between what a seller could shoot and what they needed was widest. Everything else came after: electronics, accessories, art and craft, kids, food. Add the order and rough dates. Category isn't a label on the output. It changes what the system does.

What Flyr makes — four formats

Image

Video

Catalogue

Branding

Decision 2 - What Level of Customization

Who Gets to Direct

Generation models expose dozens of parameters. Lighting, lens, pose, colour grade, aspect ratio, camera angle. Every one is a decision the seller has no basis to make, and every one is a chance to produce something worse than the default.


The obvious move is to strip all of it out and fully automate. We tried. Sellers rejected it. It's their product and their customer, and handing over the entire decision felt like handing over the shop.

Control

Model gender
Model Type
Scene
Occasion
Pose
Aspect ratio
Business details

The Question it Asks

Who buys this?
Relatable or aspirational — and at what price?
Where is this used or worn?
When is it for?
Which angle sells this product?
Where am I posting this?
Whose shop is this?

Why the seller answers it better

They've watched who walks in and who reorders
A pricing decision
Their product, their customer's life
Their stock calendar already runs on it
They know which detail closes the sale
A distribution question, not a crop question.
Name, logo, number, feeds the branding format

Designs Iterations

Home screen — three directions and a refinement

Present it as exactly that. Screens 1–3 are genuinely different organising principles; 4 is a refinement of 3. Calling a header removal a fourth concept is the kind of thing a reviewer notices, and labelling it honestly costs you nothing.

Creation screen — same treatment

Present it as exactly that. Screens 1–3 are genuinely different organising principles; 4 is a refinement of 3. Calling a header removal a fourth concept is the kind of thing a reviewer notices, and labelling it honestly costs you nothing.

image Generation Flow

Where I was wrong about the market

I was confident clothing would be the entry point and the revenue driver. It's the biggest category, the most visual, and the one where bad photography costs the most.


Research disagreed. Jewellery came back just as strong, for a reason I hadn't considered: a jewellery seller's product is small, reflective, and almost impossible to shoot well on a phone, so the gap between what they could produce and what they needed was wider than in apparel.

0

%

Cloting Category

0

%

Jwellary

0

%

Rest

Impact

Phase 1 · Dec 2025 – Jan 2026 · Photoshoot + Branding

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

Phase 2 · Feb – Jun 2026 · Catalogue added

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

Phase 3 · Jul 2026 – present · Video added

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

What this taught me

I thought the problem was photo quality. It was the seller's absence I was fixing the symptom rather than the problem.

I thought removing their decisions would help. They rejected full automation, less effort is not less control.

I thought the design work lived in the interface. It lived in a layer nobody sees I stopped counting my work in screens.

I thought video would be the unlock. Catalogue was, 22 points to 8 the unit of work beats the exciting feature.

MRR

3 Cr.+

Paying Users

16K

M3 Retention

58%

What is the Product

EasyBill turns a shopkeeper's phone into his billing counter. He photographs his shelves once to build a catalogue, then bills like he's ordering on Zepto tap rice, four kilos, add, done. The customer scans a QR and the bill lands on their WhatsApp. No printer, no paper, no POS machine.

From any random click to e- Commerce Ready Images

What a POS is actually for

A restaurant has a POS. It takes the order, prints a slip, and hands it over. The obvious product is to do that on a phone and save the shopkeeper the hardware.


But most of the shops we were looking at don't have a POS and never did. A kirana owner adds it up in his head, tells you the number, and writes it in a notebook if he writes it anywhere. The machine was never the thing he was missing.


What he's missing is everything the machine would have been quietly doing underneath: what sold, what's left, what he ordered last month, who bought it.

Choosing the buyer before we chose the problem

Casual consumer, tier 3–4

Has Need of AI Generated Images

Will not Pay for it

No revenue attached to the output, free alternatives everywhere, images are a novelty, not an quirk.

Shape Image
Card Image
Small business, 3–4 people

Has Need of AI Generated Images

Will Pay for it

Output feeds directly into sales, already spends on photography, has expendable income

Shape Image
Card Image

Key Questions that needed Answers

Q1: How does a shop without a POS actually bill someone today?

Q2: What does the owner know about his own stock, and how?

Q3: What happens at the counter when there's a queue?

Q4: Would anyone type in four hundred products?

All four needed the same thing: going and looking. So that's where I started — with the listings, and then with the people behind them.

The Research

32 shops across 5 categories — kirana, restaurant, workshop, electrical, others in Bangalore and Jamshedpur. observation based interview sat at the counter during trading hours to see the transaction happening live and interviewed after close.


The most useful hours were the busy ones. Nothing about how a shop bills is visible in a quiet interview it's visible when three people are waiting and the owner is doing four things at once.

  • bold blue text reading "OK!" on soft pink background
  • frosted aluminum can with condensation on light blue background
  • Portrait of a woman eating an icecream
  • Abstract poster of red pink circle
  • Makeup products on a white background
  • beauty portrait with glossy lips and voluminous curly hair on lavender background
  • Person surfing on the waves in the ocean
  • minimalist illustration of white lightbulb with orange base on golden yellow and teal geometric background

Platform Problem

Then I found the thing that didn't fit. The same sellers were moving the same products, at the same price, over WhatsApp and moving them well. Same photos. Same product. One channel worked; the other didn't. So the photos weren't the whole problem. Something else was carrying the sale on WhatsApp and going missing on the marketplace.

On WhatsApp, the seller is the salesperson.
On a marketplace, the photo has to be.

On WhatsApp, the seller is the salesperson.
On a marketplace, the photo has to be.

How Business was ran

Flyr's seller is two or three people, often one family, running a business out of a single room in a tier 2–4 city. They add four or five new SKUs a month not many, which means each one has to earn its place. And they list the same stock across Meesho, Amazon and Myntra.


Those three aren't interchangeable. They're a ladder, and photography is what gates it. Meesho will take almost any image. Amazon has standards. Myntra has real requirements name them: model shots, background specs and a seller who can't produce that imagery doesn't get listed there at all, however good the product is.


So the cost of bad photography isn't only lost sales on the listings they have. It's being locked out of the channel where their margin would be best.

Insights from the User Research

Photography isn't how they compete on a marketplace. It's how they qualify for one.

Output could never be "a product photo". It had to be whatever each rung of the ladder demands which is where the four formats came from, including the branded status creative that no advertising tool builds.

There is no second photo. What they have is all they will ever have.

One photo in, permanently. Every idea that quietly depended on "take a better one" — guided capture, retry prompts, quality gates — came off the table in the same week.

They don't sell the product. They sell the certainty around it.

The image had to carry context, not just quality. An occasion, a person wearing it, a sense of where it belongs. "Make the photo sharper" stopped being a plausible answer.

They know exactly what they want. They just can't say it first.

The direction of the whole interaction. Asking them to describe wants the one thing they can't give; showing them something to react to asks for the thing they're best at. Choose an outcome, don't configure an input — and every decision in Act 2 is an application of that.

What I was solving for wasn't better Images.

It was getting a seller who can't describe what good looks like to a publishable creative across platforms.

What design had to survive

constrains the users brought

Digital Literacy of users

Sellers skim. Many read English slowly, some barely at all.

Design Vocabulary

"Lifestyle", "editorial" mean nothing. They can describe the image.

Need of customization

Giving control of image feels like they control output.

Units of Products

Four or five new SKUs a month, worked on in bursts between orders.

constrains the System brought

Systematic Prompt Setup

Making the prompt lineup such that the customization fall in line rather than destroying that intent of product image of the users.

Wrong image costs more

A creative showing detail the product doesn't have gets ordered, returned, and the seller eats the shipping and the rating.

Generation isn't instant

A server round trip of 8 seconds, on a budget Android over patchy 4G. A dropped connection mid-generation is normal, not an edge case.

Problems to Solve

One photo in, One photo out

Three decisions, not Thirty

Nothing to read

No vocabulary to learn

Faithful, not flattering photos

Right the first time

Works between platforms

Introduce trust elements

Ideal Flow

1

Upload

2

Select Style

3

Customization

4

Generate

Compititor Analysis

What they share is an assumption about who's holding the phone. Background removal, AI shadow, recolour, product staging, brand kits, instant resize, batch export.


That's the correct product for a Shopify seller in Austin with some visual literacy and an afternoon. It is the wrong product for a two-person shop in Meerut adding four SKUs a month between orders not because the tools are weak, but because every one of them asks a question our seller can't answer.

The Observation

They hand you tools. We had to hand over taste.

PhotoRoom gives a seller background removal, AI shadows, recolour and product staging, then trusts them to compose something good. Our seller has no reference for what good looks like.

They put the product on a background. We put it on a person.

The editor tools stage a product in a scene. For apparel and jewellery in India the model is the sale a kurta on a hanger and the same kurta worn are not the same listing, and Myntra won't take the first one at all.

They format for storefronts. We format for status.

Instant Resize covers Instagram, Amazon and Shopify. It doesn't cover the channel these sellers actually own WhatsApp status, posted several times a day to people who've already bought once which is why Flyr sets the shop's branding into the image itself.

Decision 1 - What a Shoot Actually Produces

What they're selling — categories

We opened with two categories — clothing and jewellery because those were where the research said the gap between what a seller could shoot and what they needed was widest. Everything else came after: electronics, accessories, art and craft, kids, food. Add the order and rough dates. Category isn't a label on the output. It changes what the system does.

What Flyr makes — four formats

Image

Video

Catalogue

Branding

Decision 2 - What Level of Customization

Who Gets to Direct

Generation models expose dozens of parameters. Lighting, lens, pose, colour grade, aspect ratio, camera angle. Every one is a decision the seller has no basis to make, and every one is a chance to produce something worse than the default.


The obvious move is to strip all of it out and fully automate. We tried. Sellers rejected it. It's their product and their customer, and handing over the entire decision felt like handing over the shop.

Control

Model gender
Model Type
Scene
Occasion
Pose
Aspect ratio
Business details

The Question it Asks

Who buys this?
Relatable or aspirational — and at what price?
Where is this used or worn?
When is it for?
Which angle sells this product?
Where am I posting this?
Whose shop is this?

Why the seller answers it better

They've watched who walks in and who reorders
A pricing decision
Their product, their customer's life
Their stock calendar already runs on it
They know which detail closes the sale
A distribution question, not a crop question.
Name, logo, number, feeds the branding format

Designs Iterations

Home screen — three directions and a refinement

Present it as exactly that. Screens 1–3 are genuinely different organising principles; 4 is a refinement of 3. Calling a header removal a fourth concept is the kind of thing a reviewer notices, and labelling it honestly costs you nothing.

Creation screen — same treatment

Present it as exactly that. Screens 1–3 are genuinely different organising principles; 4 is a refinement of 3. Calling a header removal a fourth concept is the kind of thing a reviewer notices, and labelling it honestly costs you nothing.

image Generation Flow

Where I was wrong about the market

I was confident clothing would be the entry point and the revenue driver. It's the biggest category, the most visual, and the one where bad photography costs the most.


Research disagreed. Jewellery came back just as strong, for a reason I hadn't considered: a jewellery seller's product is small, reflective, and almost impossible to shoot well on a phone, so the gap between what they could produce and what they needed was wider than in apparel.

0

%

Cloting Category

0

%

Jwellary

0

%

Rest

Impact

Phase 1 · Dec 2025 – Jan 2026 · Photoshoot + Branding

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

Phase 2 · Feb – Jun 2026 · Catalogue added

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

Phase 3 · Jul 2026 – present · Video added

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

What this taught me

I thought the problem was photo quality. It was the seller's absence I was fixing the symptom rather than the problem.

I thought removing their decisions would help. They rejected full automation, less effort is not less control.

I thought the design work lived in the interface. It lived in a layer nobody sees I stopped counting my work in screens.

I thought video would be the unlock. Catalogue was, 22 points to 8 the unit of work beats the exciting feature.

MRR

3 Cr.+

Paying Users

16K

M3 Retention

58%

What is the Product

EasyBill turns a shopkeeper's phone into his billing counter. He photographs his shelves once to build a catalogue, then bills like he's ordering on Zepto tap rice, four kilos, add, done. The customer scans a QR and the bill lands on their WhatsApp. No printer, no paper, no POS machine.

From any random click to e- Commerce Ready Images

What a POS is actually for

A restaurant has a POS. It takes the order, prints a slip, and hands it over. The obvious product is to do that on a phone and save the shopkeeper the hardware.


But most of the shops we were looking at don't have a POS and never did. A kirana owner adds it up in his head, tells you the number, and writes it in a notebook if he writes it anywhere. The machine was never the thing he was missing.


What he's missing is everything the machine would have been quietly doing underneath: what sold, what's left, what he ordered last month, who bought it.

Choosing the buyer before we chose the problem

Casual consumer, tier 3–4

Has Need of AI Generated Images

Will not Pay for it

No revenue attached to the output, free alternatives everywhere, images are a novelty, not an quirk.

Shape Image
Card Image
Small business, 3–4 people

Has Need of AI Generated Images

Will Pay for it

Output feeds directly into sales, already spends on photography, has expendable income

Shape Image
Card Image

Key Questions that needed Answers

Q1: How does a shop without a POS actually bill someone today?

Q2: What does the owner know about his own stock, and how?

Q3: What happens at the counter when there's a queue?

Q4: Would anyone type in four hundred products?

All four needed the same thing: going and looking. So that's where I started — with the listings, and then with the people behind them.

The Research

32 shops across 5 categories — kirana, restaurant, workshop, electrical, others in Bangalore and Jamshedpur. observation based interview sat at the counter during trading hours to see the transaction happening live and interviewed after close.


The most useful hours were the busy ones. Nothing about how a shop bills is visible in a quiet interview it's visible when three people are waiting and the owner is doing four things at once.

  • bold blue text reading "OK!" on soft pink background
  • frosted aluminum can with condensation on light blue background
  • Portrait of a woman eating an icecream
  • Abstract poster of red pink circle
  • Makeup products on a white background
  • beauty portrait with glossy lips and voluminous curly hair on lavender background
  • Person surfing on the waves in the ocean
  • minimalist illustration of white lightbulb with orange base on golden yellow and teal geometric background

Platform Problem

Then I found the thing that didn't fit. The same sellers were moving the same products, at the same price, over WhatsApp and moving them well. Same photos. Same product. One channel worked; the other didn't. So the photos weren't the whole problem. Something else was carrying the sale on WhatsApp and going missing on the marketplace.

On WhatsApp, the seller is the salesperson.
On a marketplace, the photo has to be.

On WhatsApp, the seller is the salesperson.
On a marketplace, the photo has to be.

How Business was ran

Flyr's seller is two or three people, often one family, running a business out of a single room in a tier 2–4 city. They add four or five new SKUs a month not many, which means each one has to earn its place. And they list the same stock across Meesho, Amazon and Myntra.


Those three aren't interchangeable. They're a ladder, and photography is what gates it. Meesho will take almost any image. Amazon has standards. Myntra has real requirements name them: model shots, background specs and a seller who can't produce that imagery doesn't get listed there at all, however good the product is.


So the cost of bad photography isn't only lost sales on the listings they have. It's being locked out of the channel where their margin would be best.

Insights from the User Research

Photography isn't how they compete on a marketplace. It's how they qualify for one.

Output could never be "a product photo". It had to be whatever each rung of the ladder demands which is where the four formats came from, including the branded status creative that no advertising tool builds.

There is no second photo. What they have is all they will ever have.

One photo in, permanently. Every idea that quietly depended on "take a better one" — guided capture, retry prompts, quality gates — came off the table in the same week.

They don't sell the product. They sell the certainty around it.

The image had to carry context, not just quality. An occasion, a person wearing it, a sense of where it belongs. "Make the photo sharper" stopped being a plausible answer.

They know exactly what they want. They just can't say it first.

The direction of the whole interaction. Asking them to describe wants the one thing they can't give; showing them something to react to asks for the thing they're best at. Choose an outcome, don't configure an input — and every decision in Act 2 is an application of that.

What I was solving for wasn't better Images.

It was getting a seller who can't describe what good looks like to a publishable creative across platforms.

What design had to survive

constrains the users brought

Digital Literacy of users

Sellers skim. Many read English slowly, some barely at all.

Design Vocabulary

"Lifestyle", "editorial" mean nothing. They can describe the image.

Need of customization

Giving control of image feels like they control output.

Units of Products

Four or five new SKUs a month, worked on in bursts between orders.

constrains the System brought

Systematic Prompt Setup

Making the prompt lineup such that the customization fall in line rather than destroying that intent of product image of the users.

Wrong image costs more

A creative showing detail the product doesn't have gets ordered, returned, and the seller eats the shipping and the rating.

Generation isn't instant

A server round trip of 8 seconds, on a budget Android over patchy 4G. A dropped connection mid-generation is normal, not an edge case.

Problems to Solve

One photo in, One photo out

Three decisions, not Thirty

Nothing to read

No vocabulary to learn

Faithful, not flattering photos

Right the first time

Works between platforms

Introduce trust elements

Ideal Flow

1

Upload

2

Select Style

3

Customization

4

Generate

Compititor Analysis

What they share is an assumption about who's holding the phone. Background removal, AI shadow, recolour, product staging, brand kits, instant resize, batch export.


That's the correct product for a Shopify seller in Austin with some visual literacy and an afternoon. It is the wrong product for a two-person shop in Meerut adding four SKUs a month between orders not because the tools are weak, but because every one of them asks a question our seller can't answer.

The Observation

They hand you tools. We had to hand over taste.

PhotoRoom gives a seller background removal, AI shadows, recolour and product staging, then trusts them to compose something good. Our seller has no reference for what good looks like.

They put the product on a background. We put it on a person.

The editor tools stage a product in a scene. For apparel and jewellery in India the model is the sale a kurta on a hanger and the same kurta worn are not the same listing, and Myntra won't take the first one at all.

They format for storefronts. We format for status.

Instant Resize covers Instagram, Amazon and Shopify. It doesn't cover the channel these sellers actually own WhatsApp status, posted several times a day to people who've already bought once which is why Flyr sets the shop's branding into the image itself.

Decision 1 - What a Shoot Actually Produces

The Observation

We opened with two categories — clothing and jewellery because those were where the research said the gap between what a seller could shoot and what they needed was widest. Everything else came after: electronics, accessories, art and craft, kids, food. Add the order and rough dates. Category isn't a label on the output. It changes what the system does.

The Observation

Image

Video

Catalogue

Branding

Decision 2 - What Level of Customization

The Observation

Generation models expose dozens of parameters. Lighting, lens, pose, colour grade, aspect ratio, camera angle. Every one is a decision the seller has no basis to make, and every one is a chance to produce something worse than the default.


The obvious move is to strip all of it out and fully automate. We tried. Sellers rejected it. It's their product and their customer, and handing over the entire decision felt like handing over the shop.

Control

Model gender
Model Type
Scene
Occasion
Pose
Aspect ratio
Business details

The Question it Asks

Who buys this?
Relatable or aspirational — and at what price?
Where is this used or worn?
When is it for?
Which angle sells this product?
Where am I posting this?
Whose shop is this?

Why the seller answers it better

They've watched who walks in and who reorders
A pricing decision
Their product, their customer's life
Their stock calendar already runs on it
They know which detail closes the sale
A distribution question, not a crop question.
Name, logo, number, feeds the branding format

Designs Iterations

Home screen — three directions and a refinement

Present it as exactly that. Screens 1–3 are genuinely different organising principles; 4 is a refinement of 3. Calling a header removal a fourth concept is the kind of thing a reviewer notices, and labelling it honestly costs you nothing.

Creation screen — same treatment

Present it as exactly that. Screens 1–3 are genuinely different organising principles; 4 is a refinement of 3. Calling a header removal a fourth concept is the kind of thing a reviewer notices, and labelling it honestly costs you nothing.

image Generation Flow

Where I was wrong about the market

I was confident clothing would be the entry point and the revenue driver. It's the biggest category, the most visual, and the one where bad photography costs the most.


Research disagreed. Jewellery came back just as strong, for a reason I hadn't considered: a jewellery seller's product is small, reflective, and almost impossible to shoot well on a phone, so the gap between what they could produce and what they needed was wider than in apparel.

0

%

Cloting Category

0

%

Jwellary

0

%

Rest

Impact

Phase 1 · Dec 2025 – Jan 2026 · Photoshoot + Branding

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

Phase 2 · Feb – Jun 2026 · Catalogue added

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

Phase 3 · Jul 2026 – present · Video added

0

K +per day

Images Generated

0

%

Retention till M3

0

%

LTP

What this taught me

I thought the problem was photo quality. It was the seller's absence I was fixing the symptom rather than the problem.

I thought removing their decisions would help. They rejected full automation, less effort is not less control.

I thought the design work lived in the interface. It lived in a layer nobody sees I stopped counting my work in screens.

I thought video would be the unlock. Catalogue was, 22 points to 8 the unit of work beats the exciting feature.